| Pages:
1
..
23
24
25
26
27
..
98 |
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by appengineer  | Hi Peter,
TS doesn't support using Exchange Time with multiple data stream when the symbols are in different time zone. (NG,CL,HO,RB)
How do you go around this?
The GSB system I am trying to import into TS checks the last second of the trading session to close trades - If (TimeHms >= 133000 And TimeHms <=
133059) Then
Thank you |
Always use local time on your pc
|
|
|
appengineer
Junior Member
Posts: 61
Registered: 8-4-2019
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by admin | | Quote: Originally posted by appengineer | Hi Peter,
TS doesn't support using Exchange Time with multiple data stream when the symbols are in different time zone. (NG,CL,HO,RB)
How do you go around this?
The GSB system I am trying to import into TS checks the last second of the trading session to close trades - If (TimeHms >= 133000 And TimeHms <=
133059) Then
Thank you |
Always use local time on your pc
|
What will the session be for each of the symbols(NG, CL, HO, RB)
0900-1430 or Regular hours.
I have tried a couple of settings and the performance is different from what GSB produced.
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
appenginer, your times are correct but looks like you put nq instead of ng in the data1
also see https://trademaid.info/gsbhelp/13SupplyingDatatoGSB.html
where it says session times.
|
|
|
appengineer
Junior Member
Posts: 61
Registered: 8-4-2019
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Got it, good catch
How about the hard coded time in GSB built system
If (TimeHms >= 133000 And TimeHms <= 133059)
should it be
If (TimeHms >= 143000 And TimeHms <= 143059)
Since we are using 0900 - 1430 session time?
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by appengineer |
Got it, good catch
How about the hard coded time in GSB built system
If (TimeHms >= 133000 And TimeHms <= 133059)
should it be
If (TimeHms >= 143000 And TimeHms <= 143059)
Since we are using 0900 - 1430 session time? |
Under contracts, check your moc time is correct, should fix this for future systems
|
|
|
appengineer
Junior Member
Posts: 61
Registered: 8-4-2019
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by admin | | Quote: Originally posted by appengineer |
Got it, good catch
How about the hard coded time in GSB built system
If (TimeHms >= 133000 And TimeHms <= 133059)
should it be
If (TimeHms >= 143000 And TimeHms <= 143059)
Since we are using 0900 - 1430 session time? |
Under contracts, check your moc time is correct, should fix this for future systems |
The MOC under contract list is not editable
Also the system built has a variable called startDate which seems to be a keyword in Easy Language
|
|
|
fra2019
Junior Member
Posts: 9
Registered: 28-4-2019
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
stop loss
How do stop-loss work in GSB? I thought 'Max.Stop Loss' was the maximum currency loss per trade so 1000 max loss for 1 ES contract would mean 20
points stop loss. This does not seem to be the case. I generated a few NQ strategies with trailing stop, Max stop Loss = 2000 and the script show
slPoints(25) which implies a much tighter stop-loss.
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
A number os users users installed windows update blocker, as reboots on a live trading computer or gsb manager machine is really bad if they are not
planned.
https://www.sordum.org/downloads/?st-windows-update-blocker
Well its times to install all your updates
there are some dangerous flaws that need patching.
https://mspoweruser.com/a-million-unpatched-pcs-waiting-to-b...
|
|
|
boothy
Junior Member
Posts: 54
Registered: 21-5-2018
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Hi Peter,
I can't seem to get the macros to work properly. I'm trying to run indicators stats as per video but don't get the same results.
Please refer attached screen shots, I'm not getting any metrics for stats C, and stats E has way higher fitness and N/P.
I have tried macro, IndicatorStats, IndicatorStats+nthNoTrade and also tried making my own and none have seemed to give similar figures to your video.
Thanks.
 
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by boothy | Hi Peter,
I can't seem to get the macros to work properly. I'm trying to run indicators stats as per video but don't get the same results.
Please refer attached screen shots, I'm not getting any metrics for stats C, and stats E has way higher fitness and N/P.
I have tried macro, IndicatorStats, IndicatorStats+nthNoTrade and also tried making my own and none have seemed to give similar figures to your video.
Thanks.
send me your teamviewer details. I will look at this sat morning.
should be an easy fix
|
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by fra2019 | | How do stop-loss work in GSB? I thought 'Max.Stop Loss' was the maximum currency loss per trade so 1000 max loss for 1 ES contract would mean 20
points stop loss. This does not seem to be the case. I generated a few NQ strategies with trailing stop, Max stop Loss = 2000 and the script show
slPoints(25) which implies a much tighter stop-loss. |
Sorry for the delay in this reply. It slipped my memory as I first say it very late at night.
Check your contract point values are correct in GSB.
I would expect the stop loss to be the extreme max that the trail is allowed to go.
I can re-check this with the programmer early next week if you still have issues
|
|
|
fra2019
Junior Member
Posts: 9
Registered: 28-4-2019
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
pnt Value for NQ and VX seem correct. Curious to hear if anyone else experienced similar issue.
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
please send a screen shot of the settings, and the ts code generated
I will look at this on monday
|
|
|
boothy
Junior Member
Posts: 54
Registered: 21-5-2018
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I am trying to do testing on Silver to get best indicators and build systems but I cant seem to get any systems with good metrics.
All systems have under $10 avg trade, low net profit etc.
I have gone through the docs and forum and pretty sure I've got all setting correct for new updates / changes.
Any ideas what might be causing this for SI only? Seems to build systems fine on ES.
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Check your secondary filter is on GA, then close/closed (from memory)
ga with closed-closed also worked nearly as well (from memory)
if not send me teamviewer details.
GSB works well on soilver
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by boothy | I am trying to do testing on Silver to get best indicators and build systems but I cant seem to get any systems with good metrics.
All systems have under $10 avg trade, low net profit etc.
I have gone through the docs and forum and pretty sure I've got all setting correct for new updates / changes.
Any ideas what might be causing this for SI only? Seems to build systems fine on ES.
|
Very easy fix. Point value was wrong.
|
|
|
saycem
Junior Member
Posts: 48
Registered: 13-7-2018
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I'm unclear when to use 40 vs 1000 for Generations per your recent post. Do we leave on 1000 with 2 indicators to determine best indicators and once
we have top indicators change back to 3 and change generations to 40?
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
What happens is after 40 or 1000 generations (depends on what you set it to), the random seed will completely rebuild.
New indicator sets are chosen,
With #indicators set to 3 and 16 of them used, I saw the c/us ratio increasing (not good)
However if the generations was reduced to 40, c/us is much lower.
With gen40 on one worker I got 27835 systems, while with gen 1000 got 10768
(The workers both ran at the same time for the same duration)
You can see on the graph shown, that at 15 minutes, c/us is increasing again, and its inverse (Pass score) decreases
Also the amount of duplicates systems increase at around 10 minutes.
This all implies its time to rebuild the random GA see at 15 minutes. The exact time isnt critical, but 1000 generations is likely to be hours away.
Much too long.
2 indicators are going to hit this issue much quicker.
Keep in mind, if gsb was as simple as having only say 3 indicators, and there were 16 separate indicators - then there would be 16^3 possible systems.
= 4096
This is why c/us increases. The direction GSB development is going is to make duplicate filters tighter, but add to the amount of indicators used +
pattern filters etc
|
|
|
saycem
Junior Member
Posts: 48
Registered: 13-7-2018
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Best Indicators
I have tried to replicate the top indicators for S&P that you have posted in forum. I built on 29 30 31 (30k systms) using new signedPower settings
and 40 Generations. My list is quite different from yours. Is this down to difference in settings now?
Also by default I only have 36/40 indicators switched on which did not have CloseLessPrevClose, SS RSI or X Avg. All of these are in your top 1/3.
Just want to check that this is an error on my settings and these should be set to true which would give me 39/40.
   
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Hi Saycem
I did the same test today, and think got different results to my original ones.
However I did similar to you in testing.
My logic was our method has changed a bit since when we first did this, so I should revisit this again.
Resullts using my new set of indicators were not as good as the old. But i need to recheck my results
You should never use roofilter1pole as its redundant by the 2pole
Correct to remove one closed as they are functionaly the same with no data2
Not sure why your removed SS RSI or X Avg if they are in the top 1/3
This whole section is an area to be re-explored
|
|
|
Daniel UK1
Member
Posts: 470
Registered: 4-6-2019
Member Is Offline
|
|
Cloud Workers error messages
I seem to get error messages from cloud workers running on my pc while working, since its not from my testing in GSB, i find it rather annoying, shall
it be like this or something is wrong ?
|
|
|
Daniel UK1
Member
Posts: 470
Registered: 4-6-2019
Member Is Offline
|
|
Night session
Night session, i was going to test out the night session for ES, for example 1630 EST to 930 morning... created the data, with same time... however
it seems impossible to get any systems built, created session times with the same... using 1630 Mon - 930 Tuesday as an example... Used same times in
left side of GUI ... i cant find any reason why it should not produce any systems... also lowered filters.. is there any tweaks in order to make
night session to work since its between two dates.. that i have missed ?
Any tips or help would be appreciated.
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Daniel UK1 | Night session, i was going to test out the night session for ES, for example 1630 EST to 930 morning... created the data, with same time... however
it seems impossible to get any systems built, created session times with the same... using 1630 Mon - 930 Tuesday as an example... Used same times in
left side of GUI ... i cant find any reason why it should not produce any systems... also lowered filters.. is there any tweaks in order to make
night session to work since its between two dates.. that i have missed ?
Any tips or help would be appreciated. |
I would guess the issue is related to SF closed. On a worker (not manager) go to the top/diag tab then right click refresh. See whats going on in
gsb.
Also check top right in gsb, is fitness zero or something else.
if zero its a drastic problem. ie oyu might have time to enter set 830 to 1500 but have data 1630 to 830 etc
|
|
|
Daniel UK1
Member
Posts: 470
Registered: 4-6-2019
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by admin | | Quote: Originally posted by Daniel UK1 | Night session, i was going to test out the night session for ES, for example 1630 EST to 930 morning... created the data, with same time... however
it seems impossible to get any systems built, created session times with the same... using 1630 Mon - 930 Tuesday as an example... Used same times in
left side of GUI ... i cant find any reason why it should not produce any systems... also lowered filters.. is there any tweaks in order to make
night session to work since its between two dates.. that i have missed ?
Any tips or help would be appreciated. |
I would guess the issue is related to SF closed. On a worker (not manager) go to the top/diag tab then right click refresh. See whats going on in
gsb.
Also check top right in gsb, is fitness zero or something else.
if zero its a drastic problem. ie oyu might have time to enter set 830 to 1500 but have data 1630 to 830 etc |
Thank you, will check the settings again
|
|
|
Daniel UK1
Member
Posts: 470
Registered: 4-6-2019
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Daniel UK1 | I seem to get error messages from cloud workers running on my pc while working, since its not from my testing in GSB, i find it rather annoying, shall
it be like this or something is wrong ?
|
Any comments on these error messages that seems to be coming from cloud workers running on my PC? Shall really the host of the cloud worker be getting
error messages like this ?
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
..
23
24
25
26
27
..
98 |
![[*]](images/davis/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
