| Pages:
1
..
5
6
7
8
9
10 |
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
next release of au, has option in AU to not exit the manager if fav B members >x
requires gsb 61.26 (not even tested yet)
Thanks received (1):
+1 RandyT at 2021-02-26 23:10:13
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
The latest automation inidcator file is in cloud URL you should all have when you purchase automation.
There are some in the json file that are not yet allowed even for beta testers. (yet)
Their release depends if they seem to work ok in testing
replace the C:\gsb\GSB_Automation\.config\sf-tf-list\indicators.json with the file in cloud
This json file should have date 11 of march
Thanks received (3):
+1 NickW at 2021-03-10 16:49:15 +1 sfuser108 at 2021-03-10 16:43:20 +1 Bruce at 2021-03-10 16:18:12
|
|
|
Systemholic
Banned
Posts: 15
Registered: 5-8-2019
Member Is Offline
|
|
Replace the indicators.json as instructed but the much discussed CloselesshighlowV3 & Closetohighlow3V3 indicators are still not visible in AU for
selection as SF. If anyone can advise how to fix this issue, it would be much appreciated. Many thanks
|
|
|
RandyT
Member
Posts: 123
Registered: 5-12-2019
Location: Colorado, USA
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Systemholic  |
Replace the indicators.json as instructed but the much discussed CloselesshighlowV3 & Closetohighlow3V3 indicators are still not visible in AU for
selection as SF. If anyone can advise how to fix this issue, it would be much appreciated. Many thanks |
@Systemholic, you will not see the indicators listed with the V3 or other version numbers. If you select CloseToHighLow3, you will get the latest
underlying version of the indicator that GSB supports.
I am not familiar with the CloseLessHighLow. Perhaps that is typo.
|
|
|
Systemholic
Banned
Posts: 15
Registered: 5-8-2019
Member Is Offline
|
|
Hi Randy , many thanks for the insights. I actually did some test by selecting ClosetoHighLow3 as SF but post build system only show ClosetoHighLow3
v2 as the underlying but not the V3 which Peter & Bruce talk so highly about. I look into the indicators.json file and found that there seems to be a
"ID" tag to the name of each ndicators. If only we know what the v3 tag ID is , then maybe we can get a quick turnaround this issue by overwriting it
. In my Multicharts functions directory, i can see the two V3 indicators meaning GSB is V3 ready . Suspect we need some tweaks in AU to point to the
correct v3.
Peter any insights?
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Systemholic | Hi Randy , many thanks for the insights. I actually did some test by selecting ClosetoHighLow3 as SF but post build system only show ClosetoHighLow3
v2 as the underlying but not the V3 which Peter & Bruce talk so highly about. I look into the indicators.json file and found that there seems to be a
"ID" tag to the name of each ndicators. If only we know what the v3 tag ID is , then maybe we can get a quick turnaround this issue by overwriting it
. In my Multicharts functions directory, i can see the two V3 indicators meaning GSB is V3 ready . Suspect we need some tweaks in AU to point to the
correct v3.
Peter any insights? |
I will do anydesk / teamviewer to sort this out when your free
Thanks received (1):
+1 Systemholic at 2021-03-11 22:47:45
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
new VB spread sheet for automation purchasers only. Version 26
In your cloud link. If you don't have that anymore then email me.
New features in red. Stats F now supported
+ progress bar
Note the new CloseTohighlow9v3.neg is superior to the old highlow9v3.
Thanks received (5):
+1 Systemholic at 2021-03-17 23:43:59 +1 bizgozcd at 2021-03-17 06:34:22 +1 Bruce at 2021-03-17 02:29:02 +1 Piet at 2021-03-17 00:44:15 +1 sfuser108 at 2021-03-16 20:36:29
|
|
|
BlackBox
Junior Member
Posts: 39
Registered: 24-4-2019
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Hi Peter,
When running AU on GC, I have a issue it can't find 2 ImportIndicators gsboptset files. They aren't in C:\GSB\DATA\Settings\Optimization\Manager
Don't know where I can find them.
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by BlackBox | Hi Peter,
When running AU on GC, I have a issue it can't find 2 ImportIndicators gsboptset files. They aren't in C:\GSB\DATA\Settings\Optimization\Manager
Don't know where I can find them.
|
Im not certain what you mean, as GSB has a import indicator function that imports indicators.
However the inidcators are set by macros.
they are macros, do gsboptset files
this file in automation will copy the macos into gsb macro folder
install-into-GSB.bat
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
New in automation.
you can change the fitness type
This will be in the cloud folder for those who want it.
I will release via auto update after more testing
 
Thanks received (2):
+1 Siem at 2021-05-06 10:04:00 +1 Piet at 2021-05-06 03:00:24
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
In your pdrive folder that has AU updates, there is new xls called Project3 v29.xlsm
The update is to sort on fitness (optionally)
Big surprise on what fitness is best on nq.
Im trying more combinations now
Thanks received (1):
+1 bizgozcd at 2021-05-07 06:10:02
|
|
|
Siem
Junior Member
Posts: 35
Registered: 14-11-2020
Location: NL
Member Is Offline
|
|
Hi Peter,
Great to see huge improvements due testing with the different Fitness criterea.
Would you consider adding / testing another Fitness criterion?
(2 * percent_profitable - 100) * profit_factor * trades_count
It's based on "Ehlers Figure of Merit". John Ehlers recently introduced it in this video: https://youtu.be/zkKgyad9RFA?t=2227
According to him there are only two parameters that count when you're comparing tradingsystems: profitfactor and percent-wins (= percent profitable in
GSB). There are several figures of merit (fitness criteria) that involve the profitfactor, almost every figure of merit emphasizes profitfactor as the
dominant criterion. Ehlers prefers to emphasize percent-wins when he compares strategies. A higher percentage winners also works better
psychologically: nobody likes 5 losers in a row.
In GSB-terms the "Ehlers Figure of Merit" Fitness formula would be: (2 * percent_profitable - 100) * profit_factor
The beauty of it is that it emphasises percent-wins by heavily penalising anything below 50% percent_wins, while also taking into account the profit
factor.
I asked him why he did not take into account the number of trades, assuming at first he meant something like that by "quantity" / "close quantity". He
replied his tacit assumption is that the number of trades will not be radically different when comparing two or more strategies on the same data over
the same length of time and therefore it is ignored. It could be the case in his approach, which differs from ours.
But since we see in GSB there can be significant difference in the number of trades, I tweaked his formula slightly.
The variation now includes the total number of trades: (2 * percent_profitable - 100) * profit_factor * trades_count
I found the rest of the video worth watching too, it's specifically about optimising strategies.
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
@siem.
I think that can be almost done in 62.34
%profitable*pf*tradecount
I agree its not the same thing, and what you wrote is going to have strong bias to be > 50 % profitability.
So I will get it added regardless
just PF and Tradecount would be interesting too
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
@siem. Its done. Out in next build
Thanks received (1):
+1 Siem at 2021-05-08 08:17:30
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
GSBAutomation_20210510.2.exe in your pcloud folder. Has supports for new fitness functions added in gsb 62.38
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
GSBAutomation_20210513.1.exe in your pcloud folder. Has supports for new fitness functions added in gsb 62.39
|
|
|
sb2020
Junior Member
Posts: 20
Registered: 15-6-2020
Member Is Offline
|
|
Can I use GSB AU on ES or other markets? It seems like AU is meant for gold only. Are there macros for ES, or do I edit the macros that are installed?
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by sb2020 | | Can I use GSB AU on ES or other markets? It seems like AU is meant for gold only. Are there macros for ES, or do I edit the macros that are installed?
|
you can use on many markets
I will publish the settings used for ym/es/nq in about 24 hours in the file repository
Thanks received (1):
+1 Siem at 2021-06-04 00:57:37
|
|
|
sb2020
Junior Member
Posts: 20
Registered: 15-6-2020
Member Is Offline
|
|
Ok thanks how do I get to the repository?
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
@sb200
here are the esymnq files
I have not tested these, but tried to make them so they all install in the correct folders in gsb
NQ data file included, opt settings and the macros attached to m1 &m2 m3 buttons
m1 loads the correct settings.
m2 does the indicator build
m3 the stats
Attachment: Login to view the details
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
just posted below.
you can test it before I add to the repository
|
|
|
avatartrader
Junior Member
Posts: 60
Registered: 1-10-2018
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Hello,
I am using Automation to perform the steps to create NQ systems as outlined in the documentation, and although I indicate to repeat 4 times in the
settings, it appears that it is repeating the process 8 times instead. Under the MoveSession and MoveEntryMode, I only have 1 option selected.
Should I not have those in the command sequence at all, or could it be something else?
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by avatartrader | Hello,
I am using Automation to perform the steps to create NQ systems as outlined in the documentation, and although I indicate to repeat 4 times in the
settings, it appears that it is repeating the process 8 times instead. Under the MoveSession and MoveEntryMode, I only have 1 option selected.
Should I not have those in the command sequence at all, or could it be something else? |
I suspect its all ok
remember it does indicator testing, then build
so that's 2 runs * 4 = 8
|
|
|
avatartrader
Junior Member
Posts: 60
Registered: 1-10-2018
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by admin | | Quote: Originally posted by avatartrader | Hello,
I am using Automation to perform the steps to create NQ systems as outlined in the documentation, and although I indicate to repeat 4 times in the
settings, it appears that it is repeating the process 8 times instead. Under the MoveSession and MoveEntryMode, I only have 1 option selected.
Should I not have those in the command sequence at all, or could it be something else? |
I suspect its all ok
remember it does indicator testing, then build
so that's 2 runs * 4 = 8 |
I thought the indicator testing is performed by the "Green" command (using the greenMax10 macro). What I am seeing in the list is that the entire
sequence is 4 commands - MoveSession, MoveEntryMode, Green, Build - which I would think should constitute an entire run since the build would then use
the best indicators from "Green".
But then, this entire 4 step sequence is duplicated 8 times. However, at position 17, there is a command "ImportIndicators" in between the first set
of 4 runs and the second, so I have a total of 33 commands for 4 runs of a 4 command sequence.
Am I missing something?
|
|
|
avatartrader
Junior Member
Posts: 60
Registered: 1-10-2018
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by admin | | Quote: Originally posted by avatartrader | Hello,
I am using Automation to perform the steps to create NQ systems as outlined in the documentation, and although I indicate to repeat 4 times in the
settings, it appears that it is repeating the process 8 times instead. Under the MoveSession and MoveEntryMode, I only have 1 option selected.
Should I not have those in the command sequence at all, or could it be something else? |
I suspect its all ok
remember it does indicator testing, then build
so that's 2 runs * 4 = 8 |
Actually, I think I understand now - the first 4 runs, including the Build are just to repeat the indicator testing to find the best indicators out of
all 4, and then the second are for the system building. Is that right?
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
..
5
6
7
8
9
10 |
![[*]](images/davis/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
