| Pages:
1
..
27
28
29
30
31
..
54 |
zazzi
Junior Member
Posts: 3
Registered: 20-7-2019
Member Is Offline
|
|
Thanks - appreciated.
When you say "learn a market", I am assuming you mean, you yourself learning a market, rather than "GSB backend".
Does this imply that one needs to understand a market one is developing strategies on (which implies a somewhat chart based approach to start with)
BEFORE developing an "OKish" (not great) strategy?
The reason I ask is because if the answer is yes, that would then take a very long time to develop strategies if one wants to be diversified (not
just across strategies but countries, regions, commodities etc.) similar to a fundamental approach.
I'm distinguishing here between "understanding" a market vs "understanding statistics/probability/GSB" - could I develop a system on GSB on a wholly
new market knowing *nothing* but having an understanding of the latter, whilst still acknowledging I don't understand the Dhaka stock exchange, but
cognizant that as I deploy the system in due course, I will learn more and be able to improve my system's profitability, risk/reward ratio or whatever
metric I want? I suspect the answer is yes.
Also, I think Its clear GSB is great - admittedly, the UI is the biggest intimidator for me!
Also, I'm assuming "tool that came before GSB" means AT from the IBKR results.
THanks,
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by zazzi  | Thanks - appreciated.
Also, I'm assuming "tool that came before GSB" means AT from the IBKR results.
THanks, |
not sure what at from ibkr means. They are my fills on IB account
By learn, there are some basic things you need to know. My next video might be on this. The 'unknown' market.
1) session time. Use where the volume and range is. I did a 6 min video on this. On rate occasions there are multiple valid times. IE dax
2) what secondary filter. closedminusbpv for stock indices and GA closedbpv for most else. CL was the exception.
3) entry type. Compare2 for CL (and likely energies)
any of the cross for indices.
This is the critical stuff to get right. Its not hard but takes a bit of time. As there are many GSB users, we will get to know this as we share
results. One user doing all of this on NG right now.
4) some markets long only.
|
|
|
Daniel UK1
Member
Posts: 470
Registered: 4-6-2019
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by zazzi | Thanks - appreciated.
When you say "learn a market", I am assuming you mean, you yourself learning a market, rather than "GSB backend".
Does this imply that one needs to understand a market one is developing strategies on (which implies a somewhat chart based approach to start with)
BEFORE developing an "OKish" (not great) strategy?
The reason I ask is because if the answer is yes, that would then take a very long time to develop strategies if one wants to be diversified (not
just across strategies but countries, regions, commodities etc.) similar to a fundamental approach.
I'm distinguishing here between "understanding" a market vs "understanding statistics/probability/GSB" - could I develop a system on GSB on a wholly
new market knowing *nothing* but having an understanding of the latter, whilst still acknowledging I don't understand the Dhaka stock exchange, but
cognizant that as I deploy the system in due course, I will learn more and be able to improve my system's profitability, risk/reward ratio or whatever
metric I want? I suspect the answer is yes.
Also, I think Its clear GSB is great - admittedly, the UI is the biggest intimidator for me!
Also, I'm assuming "tool that came before GSB" means AT from the IBKR results.
THanks, |
Hi,
I would say that the biggest edge in this game is YOUR process, GSB is a tool, in your process to develop systems. GSB or any other software can be
this tool for you, however as a user i believe GSB in an excellent tool that enables me to utilise my process to end up with systems that provides me
with some very nice profits relative to quite low DD.
What makes GSB different is that there is a community and guidelines that helps you to to establish a process of your own by providing a basic
foundation that works, like Peter has done for the users. This is i think the biggest reason that so many users are succeeding and what makes GSB
stand out.
However, to be able to find the gems, the amazingly great systems, systems that have a real edge. etc etc, it will take you lots of time to learn GSB
and develop your methods. So dont expect to open up the GSB box and push the button and then its done, then you will be disappointed. But if you want
to dedicate serious time and efforts, $ reward will come... as with most of the things in life.
Good luck
Thanks received (1):
+1 zazzi at 2020-05-11 06:13:58
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Basic tertiary filters have been added to GSB, but ive not had time to even test them.
What isnt done is the ts/mc/nt code for them, and the stats features to work with them.
Still stuck on the CL video which is taking all my time, + had my primary computer OS die, which wrote off nearly a days work to restore.
Will keep you posted with updates as they occur.
German & Italian are also close for all GSB internal words.
I had wrongly assumed it was just a few hours work per language.
Its a massive task. All other languages are being done via google translate. Languages of high demand may have human correction of google translate.
The GSB docs are now also done in all language via google translate
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
new build out in a couple of days. Has lots of fixes, but tertiary filters are hidden. The TS code part of tertiary filters is not done, so we cant
check for miss-match
There is a issue of some of the beta indicators dont match across versions. Reason is there are fixes in new versions, but not old versions.
SO if a new manager users old worker, there is a miss-match
All GSB code will expire 5 of June 2020, so all users will have to update. (Done automatically via resource manager)
Thanks received (1):
+1 Daniel UK1 at 2020-05-26 08:23:41
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
58.15 is out. All users need to upgrade. Has critical bug fixes, and expiry on code updated
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
58.18 out. Fix that some users manager doesnt open, no wf to cloud and beta indicators gone. All these are related to one bug
|
|
|
engtraderfx
Junior Member
Posts: 98
Registered: 15-10-2018
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Hi Peter, I am unable to compile a recent system using SignedLog entry, looking for "GSB_Log" indicator in decision, can't see function in the latest
script import, have I missed an update?
Thanks, Dave
line in question....decision = GSB_Decision4(result, 4500, Sign(entryParams) * GSB_Log(AbsValue(4), entryParams), Sign(entryParams2) *
GSB_Log(AbsValue(4), entryParams2));
|
|
|
engtraderfx
Junior Member
Posts: 98
Registered: 15-10-2018
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Hi Peter, I am unable to compile a recent system using SignedLog entry, looking for "GSB_Log" indicator in decision, can't see function in the latest
script import, have I missed an update?
Thanks, Dave
line in question....decision = GSB_Decision4(result, 4500, Sign(entryParams) * GSB_Log(AbsValue(4), entryParams), Sign(entryParams2) *
GSB_Log(AbsValue(4), entryParams2));
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by engtraderfx | Hi Peter, I am unable to compile a recent system using SignedLog entry, looking for "GSB_Log" indicator in decision, can't see function in the latest
script import, have I missed an update?
Thanks, Dave
line in question....decision = GSB_Decision4(result, 4500, Sign(entryParams) * GSB_Log(AbsValue(4), entryParams), Sign(entryParams2) *
GSB_Log(AbsValue(4), entryParams2)); |
I think its called GSB_Logxy so that looks like a small bug.
The bigger issues is I dont think you should be using log. It makes the indicator too insignificant. You actually want power.
|
|
|
engtraderfx
Junior Member
Posts: 98
Registered: 15-10-2018
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
oops , yes I used SigLog for both Weight & EntryLevel, will have a look at the instruction again & change to Power. Tried changing to GSB_Logxy but
got error on chart, mustn't be right inputs as is.
|
|
|
asobi
Junior Member
Posts: 12
Registered: 23-10-2019
Member Is Offline
|
|
Hello Peter, is there a way (or list) to check what indicators are okay to go, and what are waiting for fixes? Thanks!
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by asobi | | Hello Peter, is there a way (or list) to check what indicators are okay to go, and what are waiting for fixes? Thanks! |
I think they are all working in the current build,but 2 users have miss-matches. This may not even be related to the new indicators
|
|
|
Gregorian
Junior Member
Posts: 97
Registered: 23-5-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by admin |
I think they are all working in the current build,but 2 users have miss-matches. This may not even be related to the new indicators
|
Actually there are still a few missing functions in the MC library. For example GSB_CloseLessPrevLowDPrevCloseD is called in GSB strategies but no
such function exists.
Also the Moon functions only exist in the user's supplied ELD which I found on the forum. They should be included in GSB's library.
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Gregorian | | Quote: Originally posted by admin |
I think they are all working in the current build,but 2 users have miss-matches. This may not even be related to the new indicators
|
Actually there are still a few missing functions in the MC library. For example GSB_CloseLessPrevLowDPrevCloseD is called in GSB strategies but no
such function exists.
Also the Moon functions only exist in the user's supplied ELD which I found on the forum. They should be included in GSB's library.
|
I will add these to the file depository in the next 30 min.
I dont have moon, but then ive never seen it in a system so its likely to get dropped
|
|
|
Gregorian
Junior Member
Posts: 97
Registered: 23-5-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I loaded the new file, but GSB_CloseLessPrevLowDPrevCloseD is still missing.
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
sorry top say, your correct. Its fixed in 20200619 version in file repository.
Thanks received (1):
+1 Gregorian at 2020-06-18 22:31:11
|
|
|
Gregorian
Junior Member
Posts: 97
Registered: 23-5-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Found another missing one: TimeCyclies
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
That hasnt been done and not likely too. Ive never seen it in a system before.
However im going to double check all of this with the next batch of indicators that are being working on (right now)
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
next build with have pearsons by date, as well as the current pearsons by trade added
This MIGHT make systems more linear by date (all periods) rather than by trade number.
Im also going to add new primary / secondary filters of support and resistance points. That might not be in the next build
Thanks received (1):
+1 moresi522 at 2020-06-23 03:06:43
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
This is added to the next build. There is a lot to go wrong with the next release due to multiple languages added.
There is also another two indicators in the short term pipeline
Thanks received (1):
+1 Daniel UK1 at 2020-06-23 12:26:48
|
|
|
Daniel UK1
Member
Posts: 470
Registered: 4-6-2019
Member Is Offline
|
|
Looking forward to testing the S 12 3 and R 1 2 3, I think it has some merit for sure, but who knows, lets see
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Just an update.
Next build I have moved some indicators from the beta mode to all users
If getting 8% increase in out of sample results on my CL benchmark.
Also the amount of indicators in pass2 increased from 6 to 9.8
Often more indicators in pass2 doesnt work out well, but this did.
There is a very hard to fix bug in the build, and I cant release till this is fixed.
There is more updates to macros. You can add by pearsons data and custom fields.
Still not recorded part2 of the CL video, but I do have a lot of the research done.
Have also made good progress on virtual machines service for people to use in trading.
Thanks received (5):
+1 bizgozcd at 2020-06-28 08:53:35 +1 moresi522 at 2020-06-27 08:31:51 +1 Daniel UK1 at 2020-06-26 12:35:55 +1 Carl at 2020-06-26 12:06:31 +1 Jdaz at 2020-06-26 10:44:10
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
There is a poll about system builders.
Great if users can put comments about GSB on there.
https://t.dripemail2.com/c/eyJhY2NvdW50X2lkIjoiOTAwOTc2MCIsI...
|
|
|
engtraderfx
Junior Member
Posts: 98
Registered: 15-10-2018
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Thanks received (1):
+1 admin at 2020-06-26 21:23:52
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
..
27
28
29
30
31
..
54 |
![[*]](images/davis/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
