| Pages:
1
..
9
10
11
12
13
..
19 |
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
That will mean an internet outage. GSB server was rebooted for 2 minutes a day or so ago too. If its not this then its on your end.
Let me know if its a problem still
|
|
|
engtraderfx
Junior Member
Posts: 98
Registered: 15-10-2018
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
thanks yes works now, I did have a lot of internet slowness that day, maybe the holiday cheer?!
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
50.54 installer file had a critical but simple bug of wrong path.
Manually change this path.
new installer soon
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
fixed in 50.55 installer
|
|
|
awrch0n
Junior Member
Posts: 3
Registered: 28-12-2018
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Trial has expired
I want to try out the software. I have just downloaded the GSB 50.55 BETA BUILD Dec 29 2018 and upon running the application I get the "Trial has
expired" message. Could you kindly provide a fix?
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by awrch0n  | | I want to try out the software. I have just downloaded the GSB 50.55 BETA BUILD Dec 29 2018 and upon running the application I get the "Trial has
expired" message. Could you kindly provide a fix? |
Please try to copy this file into c:\gsb and c:\gsb\cloud workers
If that doesnt fix it, email me your teamviwer.com details
Attachment: Login to view the details
|
|
|
awrch0n
Junior Member
Posts: 3
Registered: 28-12-2018
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
It is fixed now. Thank you.
|
|
|
awrch0n
Junior Member
Posts: 3
Registered: 28-12-2018
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
"This application will not run from within a virtual machine"
Hi Peter,
Build 50.55c
I'm getting the following error: "This application will not run from within a virtual machine".
My setup is a iMac running windows 10 on a Parallels Virtual Machine.
I am still on my trial period.
Could you please share with me the required licence file that resolves the issue?
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by awrch0n | Hi Peter,
Build 50.55c
I'm getting the following error: "This application will not run from within a virtual machine".
My setup is a iMac running windows 10 on a Parallels Virtual Machine.
I am still on my trial period.
Could you please share with me the required licence file that resolves the issue? |
I will send you an email about this
Peter
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
There is a intermittent bug on 50.66 and possible many other builds.
A system from a random worker pops up in your manager. There may be no graph and metrics may change when you click on them.
This is the top priority to fix
Clue in screen shot here is user only build ng systems, not ES
|
|
|
ProbTrader
Junior Member
Posts: 16
Registered: 3-7-2018
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Dates error
Hello
The dates functionality (IS/OOS) is still not working. The actual trades are also incorrect so the issue is not only graph related.
Please advise.
Thanks
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by ProbTrader | Hello
The dates functionality (IS/OOS) is still not working. The actual trades are also incorrect so the issue is not only graph related.
Please advise.
Thanks
|
This I hope will be fixed in 50.84. Its being worked on right now.
Programmer mentioned its due to some dates not being in either training or test period
|
|
|
coccigelus
Junior Member
Posts: 73
Registered: 11-7-2018
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
50.84.
I am getting a situation where i get same results under different metrics (net profit - DD - trades) during optimization through Manager and worker,
even tough different indicators are employed;
Tradestation confirmed something wrong. I do not recall the same issue with 50.82
 
|
|
|
Carl
Member
Posts: 342
Registered: 10-5-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Hi coccigelus,
I have seen this before. It is mathematically possible.
What other indicator are used in these three systems in your screenshot?
What results do you have in Tradestation if you use these three systems? Identical or different results?
|
|
|
coccigelus
Junior Member
Posts: 73
Registered: 11-7-2018
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Carl | Hi coccigelus,
I have seen this before. It is mathematically possible.
What other indicator are used in these three systems in your screenshot?
What results do you have in Tradestation if you use these three systems? Identical or different results?
|
Hello Carl,
I am running right now version .82 and I am not seeing those discrepancies in the results. Ts has confirmed the issue. (different results between
those systems)
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
coccigelus, You have 5 systems with the identical results. I think this is a bug. Sorting on fitness or pl will show how wide spread this is. Can you
send me teamviewer.com details
|
|
|
coccigelus
Junior Member
Posts: 73
Registered: 11-7-2018
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Peter, It was quite widespread . I have closed now .84 and using .82. Let me know If You want me to launch again and then we can keep in touch via
skype - TW.
.82 seems working fine.
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by coccigelus | Peter, It was quite widespread . I have closed now .84 and using .82. Let me know If You want me to launch again and then we can keep in touch via
skype - TW.
.82 seems working fine. |
If your on the manager, check if you can see the same system in a worker.
The worker name should be in the code. If its one of your workers see if the results match. No other users have the issue, but I think its a bug.
If you see it on .82 let me know too. I will look via teamviewer.com
|
|
|
coccigelus
Junior Member
Posts: 73
Registered: 11-7-2018
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by admin | | Quote: Originally posted by coccigelus | Peter, It was quite widespread . I have closed now .84 and using .82. Let me know If You want me to launch again and then we can keep in touch via
skype - TW.
.82 seems working fine. |
If your on the manager, check if you can see the same system in a worker.
The worker name should be in the code. If its one of your workers see if the results match. No other users have the issue, but I think its a bug.
If you see it on .82 let me know too. I will look via teamviewer.com |
Hello I am seeing the same issues with 51.01. Additional details: Although my worker is not very fast, I am not seeing those same results in the
metrics. The issues come from workers that are not in my pc such as xeon 2690x2 etc.
I'll keep opened the manager and worker If You would like have a look via TW
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by coccigelus | | Quote: Originally posted by admin | | Quote: Originally posted by coccigelus | Peter, It was quite widespread . I have closed now .84 and using .82. Let me know If You want me to launch again and then we can keep in touch via
skype - TW.
.82 seems working fine. |
If your on the manager, check if you can see the same system in a worker.
The worker name should be in the code. If its one of your workers see if the results match. No other users have the issue, but I think its a bug.
If you see it on .82 let me know too. I will look via teamviewer.com |
Hello I am seeing the same issues with 51.01. Additional details: Although my worker is not very fast, I am not seeing those same results in the
metrics. The issues come from workers that are not in my pc such as xeon 2690x2 etc.
I'll keep opened the manager and worker If You would like have a look via TW
|
Im happy to look at this with TV.
|
|
|
Bruce
Member
Posts: 115
Registered: 22-7-2018
Location: Auckland - New Zealand
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Random Workers
| Quote: Originally posted by admin | There is a intermittent bug on 50.66 and possible many other builds.
A system from a random worker pops up in your manager. There may be no graph and metrics may change when you click on them.
This is the top priority to fix
Clue in screenshot here is user only build ng systems, not ES
|
I've noticed this issue has cropped up again as per the attached screenshot. this time there is an associated system & graph.
I've performed a complete restart to see if this reoccurs in future tests.
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by TradingRails | | Quote: Originally posted by admin | There is a intermittent bug on 50.66 and possible many other builds.
A system from a random worker pops up in your manager. There may be no graph and metrics may change when you click on them.
This is the top priority to fix
Clue in screenshot here is user only build ng systems, not ES
|
I've noticed this issue has cropped up again as per the attached screenshot. this time there is an associated system & graph.
I've performed a complete restart to see if this reoccurs in future tests.
|
Im keen to fix this bug, but its hard to replicate. Suspect its systems that are floating around after grace period has expired. Its good you can sort
on the symbol and just delete them
|
|
|
coccigelus
Junior Member
Posts: 73
Registered: 11-7-2018
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Thank You for bug fix. Very happy with 51.05
|
|
|
avatartrader
Junior Member
Posts: 60
Registered: 1-10-2018
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Just a heads up about an issue in the contracts file that is currently distributed as the default - The value for "Ticks" for all EC (6E) and CD (6C)
contracts should be 20000 and not 100000 since they trade in .00005 increments and not .00001 (when I built it out I was accidentally thinking of
Forex).
Sorry about that-
|
|
|
admin
Super Administrator
Posts: 5060
Registered: 7-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by avatartrader | Just a heads up about an issue in the contracts file that is currently distributed as the default - The value for "Ticks" for all EC (6E) and CD (6C)
contracts should be 20000 and not 100000 since they trade in .00005 increments and not .00001 (when I built it out I was accidentally thinking of
Forex).
Sorry about that- |
Thanks for the tip. I will update GSB
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
..
9
10
11
12
13
..
19 |
![[*]](images/davis/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
