GSB Forums

GSB BETA BUILDS

 Pages:  1  ..  6    8    10  ..  14

zazzi - 11-5-2020 at 01:46 AM

Thanks - appreciated.

When you say "learn a market", I am assuming you mean, you yourself learning a market, rather than "GSB backend".

Does this imply that one needs to understand a market one is developing strategies on (which implies a somewhat chart based approach to start with) BEFORE developing an "OKish" (not great) strategy?

The reason I ask is because if the answer is yes, that would then take a very long time to develop strategies if one wants to be diversified (not just across strategies but countries, regions, commodities etc.) similar to a fundamental approach.

I'm distinguishing here between "understanding" a market vs "understanding statistics/probability/GSB" - could I develop a system on GSB on a wholly new market knowing *nothing* but having an understanding of the latter, whilst still acknowledging I don't understand the Dhaka stock exchange, but cognizant that as I deploy the system in due course, I will learn more and be able to improve my system's profitability, risk/reward ratio or whatever metric I want? I suspect the answer is yes.

Also, I think Its clear GSB is great - admittedly, the UI is the biggest intimidator for me!:cool:

Also, I'm assuming "tool that came before GSB" means AT from the IBKR results.



THanks,

admin - 11-5-2020 at 02:04 AM

Quote: Originally posted by zazzi  
Thanks - appreciated.


Also, I'm assuming "tool that came before GSB" means AT from the IBKR results.



THanks,

not sure what at from ibkr means. They are my fills on IB account

By learn, there are some basic things you need to know. My next video might be on this. The 'unknown' market.
1) session time. Use where the volume and range is. I did a 6 min video on this. On rate occasions there are multiple valid times. IE dax
2) what secondary filter. closedminusbpv for stock indices and GA closedbpv for most else. CL was the exception.
3) entry type. Compare2 for CL (and likely energies)
any of the cross for indices.
This is the critical stuff to get right. Its not hard but takes a bit of time. As there are many GSB users, we will get to know this as we share results. One user doing all of this on NG right now.
4) some markets long only.

Daniel UK1 - 11-5-2020 at 02:08 AM

Quote: Originally posted by zazzi  
Thanks - appreciated.

When you say "learn a market", I am assuming you mean, you yourself learning a market, rather than "GSB backend".

Does this imply that one needs to understand a market one is developing strategies on (which implies a somewhat chart based approach to start with) BEFORE developing an "OKish" (not great) strategy?

The reason I ask is because if the answer is yes, that would then take a very long time to develop strategies if one wants to be diversified (not just across strategies but countries, regions, commodities etc.) similar to a fundamental approach.

I'm distinguishing here between "understanding" a market vs "understanding statistics/probability/GSB" - could I develop a system on GSB on a wholly new market knowing *nothing* but having an understanding of the latter, whilst still acknowledging I don't understand the Dhaka stock exchange, but cognizant that as I deploy the system in due course, I will learn more and be able to improve my system's profitability, risk/reward ratio or whatever metric I want? I suspect the answer is yes.

Also, I think Its clear GSB is great - admittedly, the UI is the biggest intimidator for me!:cool:

Also, I'm assuming "tool that came before GSB" means AT from the IBKR results.



THanks,


Hi,

I would say that the biggest edge in this game is YOUR process, GSB is a tool, in your process to develop systems. GSB or any other software can be this tool for you, however as a user i believe GSB in an excellent tool that enables me to utilise my process to end up with systems that provides me with some very nice profits relative to quite low DD.

What makes GSB different is that there is a community and guidelines that helps you to to establish a process of your own by providing a basic foundation that works, like Peter has done for the users. This is i think the biggest reason that so many users are succeeding and what makes GSB stand out.

However, to be able to find the gems, the amazingly great systems, systems that have a real edge. etc etc, it will take you lots of time to learn GSB and develop your methods. So dont expect to open up the GSB box and push the button and then its done, then you will be disappointed. But if you want to dedicate serious time and efforts, $ reward will come... as with most of the things in life.


Good luck






admin - 18-5-2020 at 05:00 AM

Basic tertiary filters have been added to GSB, but ive not had time to even test them.
What isnt done is the ts/mc/nt code for them, and the stats features to work with them.
Still stuck on the CL video which is taking all my time, + had my primary computer OS die, which wrote off nearly a days work to restore.
Will keep you posted with updates as they occur.

German & Italian are also close for all GSB internal words.
I had wrongly assumed it was just a few hours work per language.
Its a massive task. All other languages are being done via google translate. Languages of high demand may have human correction of google translate.
The GSB docs are now also done in all language via google translate


translate-g.png - 93kB

admin - 26-5-2020 at 05:49 AM

new build out in a couple of days. Has lots of fixes, but tertiary filters are hidden. The TS code part of tertiary filters is not done, so we cant check for miss-match
There is a issue of some of the beta indicators dont match across versions. Reason is there are fixes in new versions, but not old versions.
SO if a new manager users old worker, there is a miss-match
All GSB code will expire 5 of June 2020, so all users will have to update. (Done automatically via resource manager)

admin - 26-5-2020 at 07:16 PM

58.15 is out. All users need to upgrade. Has critical bug fixes, and expiry on code updated

admin - 29-5-2020 at 12:13 AM

58.18 out. Fix that some users manager doesnt open, no wf to cloud and beta indicators gone. All these are related to one bug

engtraderfx - 29-5-2020 at 05:01 PM

Hi Peter, I am unable to compile a recent system using SignedLog entry, looking for "GSB_Log" indicator in decision, can't see function in the latest script import, have I missed an update?

Thanks, Dave

line in question....decision = GSB_Decision4(result, 4500, Sign(entryParams) * GSB_Log(AbsValue(4), entryParams), Sign(entryParams2) * GSB_Log(AbsValue(4), entryParams2));

engtraderfx - 29-5-2020 at 05:02 PM

Hi Peter, I am unable to compile a recent system using SignedLog entry, looking for "GSB_Log" indicator in decision, can't see function in the latest script import, have I missed an update?

Thanks, Dave

line in question....decision = GSB_Decision4(result, 4500, Sign(entryParams) * GSB_Log(AbsValue(4), entryParams), Sign(entryParams2) * GSB_Log(AbsValue(4), entryParams2));

admin - 29-5-2020 at 05:09 PM

Quote: Originally posted by engtraderfx  
Hi Peter, I am unable to compile a recent system using SignedLog entry, looking for "GSB_Log" indicator in decision, can't see function in the latest script import, have I missed an update?

Thanks, Dave

line in question....decision = GSB_Decision4(result, 4500, Sign(entryParams) * GSB_Log(AbsValue(4), entryParams), Sign(entryParams2) * GSB_Log(AbsValue(4), entryParams2));

I think its called GSB_Logxy so that looks like a small bug.
The bigger issues is I dont think you should be using log. It makes the indicator too insignificant. You actually want power.

engtraderfx - 29-5-2020 at 05:58 PM

oops , yes I used SigLog for both Weight & EntryLevel, will have a look at the instruction again & change to Power. Tried changing to GSB_Logxy but got error on chart, mustn't be right inputs as is.

asobi - 16-6-2020 at 08:39 PM

Hello Peter, is there a way (or list) to check what indicators are okay to go, and what are waiting for fixes? Thanks!

admin - 16-6-2020 at 08:42 PM

Quote: Originally posted by asobi  
Hello Peter, is there a way (or list) to check what indicators are okay to go, and what are waiting for fixes? Thanks!

I think they are all working in the current build,but 2 users have miss-matches. This may not even be related to the new indicators

Gregorian - 17-6-2020 at 10:56 PM

Quote: Originally posted by admin  

I think they are all working in the current build,but 2 users have miss-matches. This may not even be related to the new indicators


Actually there are still a few missing functions in the MC library. For example GSB_CloseLessPrevLowDPrevCloseD is called in GSB strategies but no such function exists.

Also the Moon functions only exist in the user's supplied ELD which I found on the forum. They should be included in GSB's library.

admin - 17-6-2020 at 11:00 PM

Quote: Originally posted by Gregorian  
Quote: Originally posted by admin  

I think they are all working in the current build,but 2 users have miss-matches. This may not even be related to the new indicators


Actually there are still a few missing functions in the MC library. For example GSB_CloseLessPrevLowDPrevCloseD is called in GSB strategies but no such function exists.

Also the Moon functions only exist in the user's supplied ELD which I found on the forum. They should be included in GSB's library.

I will add these to the file depository in the next 30 min.
I dont have moon, but then ive never seen it in a system so its likely to get dropped

Gregorian - 18-6-2020 at 07:24 PM

Quote: Originally posted by admin  

I will add these to the file depository in the next 30 min.


I loaded the new file, but GSB_CloseLessPrevLowDPrevCloseD is still missing.

admin - 18-6-2020 at 07:45 PM

Quote: Originally posted by Gregorian  
Quote: Originally posted by admin  

I will add these to the file depository in the next 30 min.


I loaded the new file, but GSB_CloseLessPrevLowDPrevCloseD is still missing.

sorry top say, your correct. Its fixed in 20200619 version in file repository.

Gregorian - 18-6-2020 at 10:33 PM

Found another missing one: TimeCyclies

admin - 18-6-2020 at 10:39 PM

Quote: Originally posted by Gregorian  
Found another missing one: TimeCyclies

That hasnt been done and not likely too. Ive never seen it in a system before.
However im going to double check all of this with the next batch of indicators that are being working on (right now)

admin - 19-6-2020 at 05:32 AM

next build with have pearsons by date, as well as the current pearsons by trade added
This MIGHT make systems more linear by date (all periods) rather than by trade number.
Im also going to add new primary / secondary filters of support and resistance points. That might not be in the next build

admin - 23-6-2020 at 04:03 AM

This is added to the next build. There is a lot to go wrong with the next release due to multiple languages added.
There is also another two indicators in the short term pipeline


new-indicators.png - 82kB

Daniel UK1 - 23-6-2020 at 11:28 AM

Looking forward to testing the S 12 3 and R 1 2 3, I think it has some merit for sure, but who knows, lets see

admin - 26-6-2020 at 05:22 AM

Just an update.
Next build I have moved some indicators from the beta mode to all users
If getting 8% increase in out of sample results on my CL benchmark.
Also the amount of indicators in pass2 increased from 6 to 9.8
Often more indicators in pass2 doesnt work out well, but this did.

There is a very hard to fix bug in the build, and I cant release till this is fixed.
There is more updates to macros. You can add by pearsons data and custom fields.

Still not recorded part2 of the CL video, but I do have a lot of the research done.
Have also made good progress on virtual machines service for people to use in trading.

admin - 26-6-2020 at 05:08 PM

There is a poll about system builders.
Great if users can put comments about GSB on there.
https://t.dripemail2.com/c/eyJhY2NvdW50X2lkIjoiOTAwOTc2MCIsI...

engtraderfx - 26-6-2020 at 08:21 PM

:thumbup:

Gregorian - 27-6-2020 at 07:45 PM

Another missing indicator: GSB_BollingerBandHL

admin - 29-6-2020 at 05:36 AM

Quote: Originally posted by Gregorian  
Another missing indicator: GSB_BollingerBandHL

Hi Gregorian,
I dont have this file and dont know exactly whats in it. I only have the c# code.
Its never made its way into a system using the 2 pass method, so not likely to be released.
Next build has about 7 indicators that will make there way for all users. (they are very good)
Here is the c# code if you can figure it out.
Apologies for not being more helpful.
If you desperately need it, and are stuck let me know. If you manager to make the EL code, please post

Attachment: Login to view the details

admin - 29-6-2020 at 05:43 AM

Hi Gregorian,
I found my notes on this
Its this code with furthter modification. GSB_counterTrend




bolHL.png - 71kB

admin - 29-6-2020 at 05:49 AM

58.29 should be released later in the week. Testing is going well now.
Remember, the forum, cloud and web site will be down for a number of hours in 24 hours from now.
Main GSB back-end is being rebuild. The OS is running badly.

admin - 2-7-2020 at 12:58 AM

I released 58.29.
While im not totally happy with this build, there are no major issues. Some cosmetic ones.
All ELD that are needed are supplied in c:\gsb and C:\GSB\Supplementary Scripts (TS & MC)
The main reason I released it is stats feature doesnt work if you use the 58.18 build with 59.29 build.
All my cloud is on 58.29 and has been for a week or so

I think this build has fix for stats in secondary filter not working when applied to the indicators.
macro additions.
s1,s2,s3,r1,r2,r3 indicators (they work well)

admin - 3-7-2020 at 04:31 AM

July 3 2020
58.33 Released. This has a lot of bug fixes. Known issue that windows operating system not in English may fail to run GSB, or produce systems.
This issue is being looking into as #1 priority.

Worse case you need to use 58.180 build.

admin - 9-7-2020 at 01:12 AM

under testing 58.390
This has lots of macro tweaks.
SHown here is the complete two pass method done from the command line.
More tweaks to come


twopass.png - 15kB

admin - 9-7-2020 at 01:18 AM

also soon is percentR and smoothwaveindex.


percentr.png - 56kB

admin - 9-7-2020 at 11:36 PM

58.440 under testing
bug fixes. macro verify (not tested)
all features needed for 2 pass + build in macros
macro nth
macro change amount of indicator
macro do stats and select green, green + orange and save opt settings
Still not fix for non English windows (sorry that its not done yet)
all exe files digitally signed now.
see file repository for macros used in two pass. (will publish in next day)

admin - 10-7-2020 at 01:29 AM

June 10 2020 58.440 released. Updated eld are in this build, it has a few of the missing beta tester indicator/functions. (ie averageupmove etc)
A note for Beta tester users who have the 100+ indicators
Every time a new build is released, the impersonate feature resets to trial users, and you loose all the extra features.
The fix is change to beta user, save app and opt settings {im not sure what one if any contain this info}
then restart GSB. This bug will be fixed in later build of GSB

impersonate.png - 94kB

admin - 11-7-2020 at 01:08 AM

July 11 2020
build 58.47 released to all users. It has batch files, and macros in it, and version GSB_SCRIPTS_2020_06_22D+WITHUPDATEDGSBSYS1ES_V1.21 of the TS scripts. ( has a few missing functions for those beta users who have the 100+ indicators)

see this thread on automation for the new features.
https://trademaid.info/forum/viewthread.php?tid=266
Will be documented more in time.
2 pass + build is 100% working from command line.
you can even run the batch file multiple times to get say 4 results of the two pass method

admin - 11-7-2020 at 01:11 AM

Note, numerous users are not getting manager updates, but workers are ok
if this is the case, copy
C:\GSB\Workers\GSBWorker.58.470 to c:\gsb\
rename the file to GSBManager.58.470
also copy version.txt abd gsb.pdp from C:\GSB\Workers\ to c:\gsb\
Im looking into why this occurs

admin - 13-7-2020 at 05:11 PM

.48 released. Has export of indicators used in macros



added.png - 28kB

admin - 14-7-2020 at 11:32 PM

user Carl sent me this.
Can non english (windows) users try this to see if it fixes the issue
Starting GSB 58.48 on non English Windows 10

Restart laptop
Rightclick - Solve Compatibility issue (Compatibility Windows 8)
start GSB (admin rights)
Rightclick - Solve Compatibility issue (Compatibility Windows 8)
start GSB (admin rights)

Then GSB 58.48 starts. I am able to reproduce this a couple of times in
a row.

admin - 15-7-2020 at 05:41 AM

version 58.50 under testing.
Option to export full stats via macro , not just custom export
further enhancements so GSB automation can optionally close or not close managers when they are complete.
Here is first draft of GSB automation


gsb-au.png - 264kB

admin - 15-7-2020 at 04:58 PM

version 50 has more export options.
For those of you who want full stats export, turn custom export to false
{full stats didnt work in .50 but should be fixed in .51}



customexport.png - 115kB


fullstats.png - 212kB

admin - 16-7-2020 at 04:41 PM

58.44 under testing. Long awaited fix for non English windows issue.
If anyone with non English windows wants to test, send me an email.

admin - 16-7-2020 at 08:44 PM

jul 17 2020. Released 58.44 Please confirm its fixed non english windows issues

LucaRicatti - 21-7-2020 at 08:52 AM

Hi Peter I can't test,
RM to last version (updated RM by waiting 30 sec, no update pressing OK button when requested).
Then the RM update task doesn't update the manager/standalone (i'm still on 57.73 - too old and autoexit), but updated the workers.


RandyT - 21-7-2020 at 08:58 AM

Quote: Originally posted by LucaRicatti  
Hi Peter I can't test,
RM to last version (updated RM by waiting 30 sec, no update pressing OK button when requested).
Then the RM update task doesn't update the manager/standalone (i'm still on 57.73 - too old and autoexit), but updated the workers.



Luca, until Peter wakes up...

Make sure you do not have manager/standalone processes running when trying to do an update. I know that was one of the reasons GSB was not updating manager/standalone.

LucaRicatti - 21-7-2020 at 09:33 AM

Thanks Randy!
I don't have any manager opened, i will wait ES live systems closing time and reboot the system after three months, maybe there's a process active on the manager folder...

admin - 21-7-2020 at 04:42 PM

Quote: Originally posted by LucaRicatti  
Thanks Randy!
I don't have any manager opened, i will wait ES live systems closing time and reboot the system after three months, maybe there's a process active on the manager folder...


Before too long I will make a new installer for RM icase updates dont work.
Randy was correct that older RM will not update manager if its open.
Fixed in july 2020 RM
Luca, if your stuck, email me teamviewer.com details

admin - 22-7-2020 at 04:37 AM

58.56 should be out soon. I have not had time to test.
In it is fix that some users get no systems at all unless they reset opt settings to default.

For beta testers with the 100_ indicators, load version D of the GSB eld files.
It has v2 indicators that are fixes for bugs in logic ">" instead of "<=" in some code
(GSB and TS/MC)

admin - 22-7-2020 at 05:09 AM

Note in the GSB automation forum, I released to all purchased users todays build

admin - 29-7-2020 at 03:58 AM

58.62 released
Improvents to macros, export stats can now be in great details.
error message if command line parmaters are wrong.
This build or newer must be used with todays release (via auto update) of GSB automation


mode.png - 125kB

Daniel UK1 - 29-7-2020 at 05:02 AM

Many thanks Peter, Would it be possible for you to document, the stats export and how this works with the added option? so i can solve my stats export issues ?

admin - 29-7-2020 at 05:08 AM

Quote: Originally posted by Daniel UK1  
Many thanks Peter, Would it be possible for you to document, the stats export and how this works with the added option? so i can solve my stats export issues ?


yes, but too busy on other things right now.
you will want custom export expanded mode
the rest you could leave as default
im not certain it works, but file name, data streams should only write on the first run of AU. ie in AU when index on the left = 1 only

admin - 4-8-2020 at 12:51 AM

next build we have the option to
1) force a min of x indicators if there are not enough green
default will be 5 {force min false}
2) force x indicators regardless of green
this is shown in screen shot
we will get 10 indicators {force min = true}


min10.png - 42kB

Daniel UK1 - 4-8-2020 at 01:19 AM

Sounds great Peter, does the setting in this view for green and orange have any impact of the behavior of i set to min 5indicators ?

admin - 7-8-2020 at 04:39 AM

in next build, ability to force x indicators in 2 pass, ability to have a min of y indicators
count in stats of how many indicators are used
tertiary filters are now working (there were bugs) but disabled till we have ts code in gsb
and the stats. Progress on TF is happening, but extremely slow

im doing the tests on forced 10,8,6,4 indicators.
10 and 8 are done, but results not compiled from csv into excel
If you have a high end machine, your welcome to send me the share key to add the cloud used for this
My guess is processing done by Tuesday. Contributors get the research results.

OUrocketman - 7-8-2020 at 09:33 PM

Quote: Originally posted by admin  
in next build, ability to force x indicators in 2 pass, ability to have a min of y indicators
count in stats of how many indicators are used
tertiary filters are now working (there were bugs) but disabled till we have ts code in gsb
and the stats. Progress on TF is happening, but extremely slow

im doing the tests on forced 10,8,6,4 indicators.
10 and 8 are done, but results not compiled from csv into excel
If you have a high end machine, your welcome to send me the share key to add the cloud used for this
My guess is processing done by Tuesday. Contributors get the research results.


Peter, I've emailed you the share key which should net you 7 additional resources. Let me know if it's not cooperating.

Best Wishes!

admin - 13-8-2020 at 10:51 PM

58.71 under testing
Note the default of 4 for min number of indicators.
IF you need to have indentical results on a benchmark, you may want to change this value to 1
However I expect 4 to be better


def4.png - 32kB

admin - 13-8-2020 at 10:56 PM

there is also settings pearsonspf so you can change the training pearsons / pf by macro
Daniel said he found lower pearsons / pf on indicator testing and higher on system build worked better

I tried lower on indicator testing and system build, and results were worse.
This is only for the adventurous users to play with

settingsPearsons.png - 29kB

admin - 13-8-2020 at 11:07 PM

we also have custom export expanded
In this last build , for 1000 separator removed and "" as separator removed in custom export expanded


export-stats.png - 137kB

Bruce - 14-8-2020 at 01:48 AM

Quote: Originally posted by admin  
there is also settings pearsonspf so you can change the training pearsons / pf by macro
Daniel said he found lower pearsons / pf on indicator testing and higher on system build worked better

I tried lower on indicator testing and system build, and results were worse.
This is only for the adventurous users to play with


Hi Peter,

Do you select the MAcros from C:\GSB\GSBAutomation\macrostoaddIntoGSB to insert the newer filters? Just making sure I do this to the right macros so the AU picks them up. Thanks.

admin - 14-8-2020 at 02:01 AM

Bruce
edit the macros in gsb called green etc and the greenorange etc
im not sure what your trying to do.
the new gsb by default will have min of 4 in the macro
Note in your build macro, you want to add tellautomationthatgsbFinished
It makes automation think gsb is finished, which means stats doesnt slow the whole process down

tellgsbdone.png - 108kB

Bruce - 14-8-2020 at 04:06 AM

Quote: Originally posted by admin  
Bruce
edit the macros in gsb called green etc and the greenorange etc
im not sure what your trying to do.
the new gsb by default will have min of 4 in the macro
Note in your build macro, you want to add tellautomationthatgsbFinished
It makes automation think gsb is finished, which means stats doesnt slow the whole process down


I'm trying to do this;



settingsPearsons.png - 29kB

admin - 14-8-2020 at 06:21 AM

Quote: Originally posted by Bruce  
Quote: Originally posted by admin  
Bruce
edit the macros in gsb called green etc and the greenorange etc
im not sure what your trying to do.
the new gsb by default will have min of 4 in the macro
Note in your build macro, you want to add tellautomationthatgsbFinished
It makes automation think gsb is finished, which means stats doesnt slow the whole process down


I'm trying to do this;


Hi Bruce, are you saying it doesnt work? Im not clear on what you say

admin - 18-8-2020 at 08:09 PM

gsb counter trendhl and are faulty.

These will be renamed to counter trendhlv2, counter trendhl2v2

New eld will be supplied. Likely in the next build
Thanks to user Joe for spotting this.


ct-busted.png - 149kB

meldinman - 18-8-2020 at 08:27 PM

I believe GSB_Moonsaw may be faulty as well.

admin - 18-8-2020 at 08:36 PM

Quote: Originally posted by meldinman  
I believe GSB_Moonsaw may be faulty as well.

can you explain more?
I think the range of parameters supplied was the issue, but its been a long time since I looked at it

meldinman - 18-8-2020 at 08:56 PM

If I recall, the function was looking for only a weight parameter even though systems where building the code with a source varieable + a weight

admin - 18-8-2020 at 10:34 PM

Quote: Originally posted by meldinman  
If I recall, the function was looking for only a weight parameter even though systems where building the code with a source varieable + a weight

I dont see how that can compile. Next time you see it, can we do teamviewer.com?

Carl - 19-8-2020 at 02:13 AM

Quote: Originally posted by admin  
Quote: Originally posted by meldinman  
If I recall, the function was looking for only a weight parameter even though systems where building the code with a source varieable + a weight

I dont see how that can compile. Next time you see it, can we do teamviewer.com?


Hi Peter,

Maybe meldinman means the TS function only has a weight and no other variable, but GSB uses the moon function with a weight and a other variable?
But that is not the case, the TS function and GSB use variable "shift".

meldinman - 19-8-2020 at 07:14 AM

something like that carl. It wasnt compiling either way. Will take a screenshot next time .

admin - 28-8-2020 at 02:35 AM

Tertiary filter stats has been done, but apply to settings doesnt work, and there is no TS/MC/NT code yet

admin - 28-8-2020 at 02:35 AM

Tertiary filter stats has been done, but apply to settings doesnt yet work, and there is no TS/MC/NT code yet.
No update yet on when I get the TS code etc, but im as keen as anyone for it to happen


tf.png - 284kB

admin - 28-8-2020 at 06:43 PM

58.74 released. It has tf stats but I think its disabled for users except me. This build just allows me to do some TF testing on what cloud workers are free.
I will release a build with tf and stats, but no ts code soon.
TF will only work for beta tester mode.
Big picuture is,
1) how do I use tf and stats
2) what tf do I add into GSB first
Im thinking of all the Andrea Unger type of pattern filters (daily bars)
ie trade if last daily bar is inside bar, (or the opposite etc)
Im open to ideas on this. Long term lots of stuff will be added, beta testers can see what works,
then we release into build for all users the stuff that works

Daniel UK1 - 29-8-2020 at 04:37 AM

Quote: Originally posted by admin  
58.74 released. It has tf stats but I think its disabled for users except me. This build just allows me to do some TF testing on what cloud workers are free.
I will release a build with tf and stats, but no ts code soon.
TF will only work for beta tester mode.
Big picuture is,
1) how do I use tf and stats
2) what tf do I add into GSB first
Im thinking of all the Andrea Unger type of pattern filters (daily bars)
ie trade if last daily bar is inside bar, (or the opposite etc)
Im open to ideas on this. Long term lots of stuff will be added, beta testers can see what works,
then we release into build for all users the stuff that works


Great progress..
1, I assume same as secondary filters and primary right? or do you see any difference here?

One thing to look out for i believe is to monitor the correlation ie the edge that the tf is having on the system... so perhaps an easy way in code to switch filters on and off, to test going ahead after launching live systems or systems that is in test "bench" before production.

2, Andrea unger types of filters yes, you could also use n bars up then n bars down.. or reverse.. you can also add *this last one i would like to say "i believe you should add" closing range of yesterdays bar with definable closing range ie top n % or bottom n %.. defined for long or short.

One has to be careful though with adding to many filters though, easy to "filter" oneself out to perfection during training :)

Cheers

admin - 29-8-2020 at 05:12 AM

Agreed Daniel. I like that range filter too.
If the TF shows all 250 systems to improve with test repeated 4 times, then I would be happy with that as an outcome

admin - 31-8-2020 at 02:02 AM

At long last, TF is close.
Tertiary filter ts/mc code has been done, but not tested it all.
I dont think TF will be useful however till we populate tf with pattern filters etc.
That however is a small task compared to making the first TF

Be careful. TF settings for some users is set to 2. This wont build systems.
fixed in 58.76


tf-0.png - 68kB

admin - 3-9-2020 at 05:44 AM

Just an update whats been happening.
GSB automation has had bug fixes, and we are working on adding TF and entry types too it.
Alertmon - part of the software to improve execution errors is progressing, but slowly.
GSB TF is progressing,
More hours are done by programmers at the moment, hence my silence on the forum.
Just a note, seasonal trends could lead to market retracement.
Im working on crm / email out software which is really complex.
I dont want to hassle people, but also want to share things of interest to people.
Trading VM service is running, but just doing a few test users for now.

Daniel UK1 - 3-9-2020 at 03:26 PM

Busy here with NG since a few month back, which i think a few of us are working on... btw Alertmon, what is the plan with this?

Btw, very good day for ES today, all systems triggered.. been very slow for ES for some time, so this was nice.

Looking forward testing TF..

Cheers

admin - 4-9-2020 at 12:35 AM

Quote: Originally posted by Daniel UK1  
Busy here with NG since a few month back, which i think a few of us are working on... btw Alertmon, what is the plan with this?

Btw, very good day for ES today, all systems triggered.. been very slow for ES for some time, so this was nice.

Looking forward testing TF..

Cheers

alertmon will be part of the VM service. Will detect all sort of execution issues.
https://trademaid.info/gsbhelp/AlertmonMonitoring.html
My post was timely. Said market retracement was due. Absolute ripper of a day.

Daniel UK1 - 4-9-2020 at 12:49 AM

Quote: Originally posted by admin  
Quote: Originally posted by Daniel UK1  
Busy here with NG since a few month back, which i think a few of us are working on... btw Alertmon, what is the plan with this?

Btw, very good day for ES today, all systems triggered.. been very slow for ES for some time, so this was nice.

Looking forward testing TF..

Cheers

alertmon will be part of the VM service. Will detect all sort of execution issues.
https://trademaid.info/gsbhelp/AlertmonMonitoring.html
My post was timely. Said market retracement was due. Absolute ripper of a day.


I thought alertmon would be available as standalone? i run dedicated servers for production and would like something like this.

Cheers

admin - 4-9-2020 at 12:57 AM

Quote: Originally posted by Daniel UK1  
Quote: Originally posted by admin  
Quote: Originally posted by Daniel UK1  
Busy here with NG since a few month back, which i think a few of us are working on... btw Alertmon, what is the plan with this?

Btw, very good day for ES today, all systems triggered.. been very slow for ES for some time, so this was nice.

Looking forward testing TF..

Cheers

alertmon will be part of the VM service. Will detect all sort of execution issues.
https://trademaid.info/gsbhelp/AlertmonMonitoring.html
My post was timely. Said market retracement was due. Absolute ripper of a day.


I thought alertmon would be available as standalone? i run dedicated servers for production and would like something like this.

Cheers

It can run standalone, but need to think though if its released that way. Im going to test on the VM users first. It also depends on how much support users need.
A good problem im having, is drowning in opportunity. FOr example I could release IBlink, but if so massive task to document such a powerful and complex product

admin - 6-9-2020 at 09:25 PM

7 Sept 2020 58.84 released
has CloseOverPrevHighDLowD CloseOverHighDLowDCloseD
TF working, improvments and bug fixes
Improvment in MOC for tick data
Fix to GSB_CounterTrendHL & GSB_CounterTrendHL2 now called
GSB_CounterTrendHLv2 & GSB_CounterTrendHL2v2
new eld included in the update GSB_SCRIPTS_2020_08_31+WITHUPDATEDGSBSYS1ES_V1.21.eld

Gregorian - 7-9-2020 at 05:09 PM

Function missing in the 58.84 ELD: GSB_Kurtosis

admin - 7-9-2020 at 05:11 PM

Quote: Originally posted by Gregorian  
Function missing in the 58.84 ELD: GSB_Kurtosis

I dont even know when we got that.
Use Kurtosis for now. I will update in next release

admin - 14-9-2020 at 04:44 AM

58.86 out tomorrow
Updated expiry date on the code
GSBsys1NT code included (almost the same) - same as whats in private forum
dummy script for Nt 202004 date. New NT code updates are in the pipeline

admin - 16-9-2020 at 09:41 PM

sept 17 2020
58.88 released
bug fix, nt code for gsbsys1es
Expiry date extended
Support ticket issue fixed

portfolioquanttrader2020 - 17-9-2020 at 07:50 AM

Hi I have problems,
My interface is different

portfolioquanttrader2020 - 17-9-2020 at 07:50 AM

Hi I have problems,
My interface is different

admin - 17-9-2020 at 04:40 PM

Quote: Originally posted by portfolioquanttrader2020  
Hi I have problems,
My interface is different

I will look via teamviewer. Without picture of whats different, its hard to say more.

admin - 21-9-2020 at 05:18 AM

New NT code tomorrow. Fixes and or additional code with the newer closeD filters.

NickW - 21-9-2020 at 11:12 AM

Would be great if GSB can support MultiCharts.NET as well.

bizgozcd - 21-9-2020 at 11:15 AM

Quote: Originally posted by NickW  
Would be great if GSB can support MultiCharts.NET as well.

I know it's a stretch, but Python would be a huge value add as well.

RandyT - 21-9-2020 at 11:17 AM

Quote: Originally posted by NickW  
Would be great if GSB can support MultiCharts.NET as well.


I would whole heartedly support this!

Would be nice to get on a real programming language. I have more faith in Multicharts' system management than I do Ninjatrader. Ninjatrader has always been a bit flaky for me when it comes to running a bunch of systems. Multicharts' PortfolioManager is very nice and I hear getting even better in version 14.


Wingnuts - 21-9-2020 at 03:47 PM

Agree about MultiCharts strategy management being very good.
I've been running MC Beta v14 (the regular version running ELD code, not the .NET version) live for several months, and its strategy management and monitoring is so much better than Ninja or Tradestation.
I never had much luck with Ninja, strategies kept getting disconnected from charts and other issues.
MC seems rock solid, I presume the .NET version would be the same but have not used it.

RandyT - 21-9-2020 at 04:37 PM

Quote: Originally posted by Wingnuts  
Agree about MultiCharts strategy management being very good.
I've been running MC Beta v14 (the regular version running ELD code, not the .NET version) live for several months, and its strategy management and monitoring is so much better than Ninja or Tradestation.
I never had much luck with Ninja, strategies kept getting disconnected from charts and other issues.
MC seems rock solid, I presume the .NET version would be the same but have not used it.


Same experience for me with Ninja and strategies.

Great to hear that MC v14 is solid. I've not yet been brave enough to try it.

A few months back I did an eval of MC.Net and found it to be equal across the board to the standard MC in features and user interface. No differences that I could see other than the underlying code differences. They allow you to switch platforms for $100 fee as I remember.

I spent a day or two trying to port the GSB Ninjatrader libraries to MC and made some decent headway although there is some work to do there. Mostly in understanding the .Net vocabulary that MC uses vs. Ninja.

admin - 21-9-2020 at 04:47 PM

Quote: Originally posted by NickW  
Would be great if GSB can support MultiCharts.NET as well.



Good change this and or python might happen, but its years away. There is so much to be done first. If I took this on, then GSB development would stall for a very long time.
Many of the issues would be just getting things to match, though mc c# should be less of an issue. TS to MC was full of the most obscure quirks and bugs that are not apparent in normal usage

portfolioquanttrader2020 - 23-9-2020 at 11:46 PM

Hi
I have built 50000 systems.
I need to know how to do the WFO and keep the top 250 systems

admin - 23-9-2020 at 11:51 PM

Quote: Originally posted by portfolioquanttrader2020  
Hi
I have built 50000 systems.
I need to know how to do the WFO and keep the top 250 systems

You need a macro to add the top 250 systems into favorites.
Ive made one here.
it is critical the dates on the system are back to whatever was used to build the system
before you run the macro

Attachment: Login to view the details

these questions need to go under this topic next time
https://trademaid.info/forum/viewthread.php?tid=229
Happy to help :)

portfolioquanttrader2020 - 25-9-2020 at 01:06 AM

Hi peter
When you do the WFO of the systems in GSB, do you optimize all the parameters of the system? (inputs)

portfolioquanttrader2020 - 25-9-2020 at 01:06 AM

Hi peter
When you do the WFO of the systems in GSB, do you optimize all the parameters of the system? (inputs)

 Pages:  1  ..  6    8    10  ..  14